post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-22078,single-format-standard,stockholm-core-2.2.5,select-theme-ver-8.4,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_menu_,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.6.0,vc_responsive,elementor-default,elementor-kit-23340
Using competencies for Selection and Hiring

Wild and Wacky Interview Questions

Why You Should Use Structured Interview Questions During Hiring

Types of interview questions

One of the most important decisions an organization can make is to who to hire. To help inform these decisions, a hiring manager will interview applicants to get a sense of whether that person’s skills, abilities, knowledge, and values fit the job and the organization. Hiring managers typically use a variety of types of questions, such as behavioral interview questions (those that measure a candidate’s approach based on past experience) and situational questions (those that show how a candidate would react to a specific scenario). However, the use of non-traditional interview questions to make hiring decisions has become much more common in recent years. For example, the candidate may be asked questions like, “What do you think of garden gnomes”? or “if you could be any kind of tree, what kind of tree would you be and why?” The idea behind these types of questions is that you can learn about how a candidate thinks, how creative they are, or how they handle on the spot challenges.

Should these non-traditional questions be used?

1. What do they measure?

Research has yet to demonstrate that these non-traditional interview questions accurately predict successful performance. Going back to the non-traditional interview question, if you could be any kind of tree, what kind of tree would you be and why; if someone answered that they wanted to be an oak tree because they can then build roots. Does this answer mean that they would be a good leader or that they want to stay long term with the organization? It is very hard to interpret a candidate’s response and link it to the skills they would need to be successful on the job.

2. How do you rate them?

The answers to these questions would vary a great deal from candidate to candidate. This would make coming up with a rating scale very challenging and it would also make it next to impossible to compare candidates’ responses. If you cannot compare candidates’ responses, how would you know who is better suited for the job?

How to structure your questions

There are several things you can do to ensure that your interview process is legally defensible and that it will help you to make the best hiring decisions possible.

1. Link the questions back to the requirements of the job

When developing your questions, it is important to ensure that the questions are based on the results of the job analysis. If it was determined that a critical skill for the job was customer focus, then you can ask the candidates behavioral questions such as, “describe a situation where you needed to deal with a difficult customer?” This way you can see how the candidate has acted in the past because one of the best predictors of future performance is past performance.

2. Ask the same questions of each candidate

By asking each candidate the same questions, it allows you to more objectively compare candidates in terms of their skills.

3. Use a standard rating scale

To ensure fairness and an objective process, it is important to develop a standard rating scale that defines what a good answer and a poor answer looks like.

4. Train the interviewers

To ensure a fair, defensible, and effective process, it is important to ensure that hiring managers or whoever is conducting the interview are trained on how to open the interview, how to ask the questions, use the provided probes, take notes, and evaluate each answer.

Campion MA, Palmer DK, Campion JE. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655–702.